Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Review: Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf

Mrs. Dalloway was my first journey down the rabbit hole with Virginia Woolf.  At first, I plunged into dark recesses of Woolf’s mind and it was evident to me that she probably had very little friends, as she seemed to hate a lot of things about people.  As the novel evolves, we learn the most about the two main characters – Clarisa Dalloway and Peter Walsh, two former lovers who now appear in their early fifties.  Peter Walsh tried to marry her many years ago, but was revoked because Clarissa thought that a marriage would damage them, despite the fact that they were in love.  Clarissa ends up marrying Richard Dalloway, whom she loves, but not in the kindred spirit way she did with Peter.  Peter has several failed relationships with women under his belt, and a proposal to marry a wealthy and prominent girl from India.
Woolf lets us know this information in between bits of trivial life information; though, in the trivial, we learn about the thought processes of the characters and obtain a deep understanding of what they’re like.  Woolf does a marvelous job with character development with seemingly small pieces of information about minor events in life.  Characters are real and whole, and not plagued by stereotypes or other simple tools.  Their flaws are presented but not summarized and as a reader, you’re able to form your own decisions about the characters without Woolf intending you to feel one way or the other about them.
At times, the text seems jagged and disconnected and as such, is not always an enjoyable read.  The point of the work does not make itself evident to the very end and seems to be summed up a little too succinctly for my tastes, though I do like the message: “’What does the brain matter,’ said Lady Rosseter, getting up, ‘compared to the heart?’”  The message is particularly relevant to me at the moment and follows up the message about love in Ben-Hur quite nicely, as well.  It brings us back to the age-old question – follow your mind or follow your heart?

I think we’re meant to believe that things would have been better, at least for Peter and Clarissa, had they given love a shot and stopped overthinking – something we learn that both of them do on a daily basis.  The thing is, we really can’t be certain that it would have been.  Perhaps Clarissa was right and they would have destroyed each other, which leads me back to the adage that maybe “it’s better to lose in love than not love at all.” 
The ending is left ambiguously and I will replicate it in its entirety here, so skip this part if you don’t want to hear it.  “’What does the brain matter,’ said Lady Rosseter, getting up, ‘compared to the heart?’

 “’I will come up,’ said Peter, but he sat on for a moment.  What is this terror? What is this ecstasy? He thought to himself.  What is it that fills me with extraordinary excitement?
It is Clarissa, he said.

For there she was.” 215
Perhaps being terrified and excited to see someone is love?  You would hope that the former would dissipate with time but the real question is if the latter does.  Is love a constant excitement?  Many questions brought forth by Woolf, and I suppose it’s our job as readers to debate the answers.  On the whole, an enjoyable read which will eventually lead me to jump down Woolf’s dark rabbit hole again – in another work.

P.S. It didn’t really fit in this mini-review, but both Clarissa and a shell-shocked Septimus had a way of viewing the world for it’s incredible beauty followed by its seedy underbelly.  It was quite a thing to witness – and I felt as if these characters had some very similar traits with me.  It leads me to question whether all truly passionate and observant people go through this.

OTHER QUOTATIONS:
“And down his mind went flat as a marsh, and three great emotions bowled over him; understanding; a vast philanthropy; and finally, as if the result of the others, an irrepressible, exquisite delight; as if inside his brain by another hand, strings were pulled, shutters moved, and he having nothing to do with it, yet stood at the opening of endless avenues down which if he chose he might wander.  He had not felt so young for years.

He has escaped! Was utterly free – as happens the downfall of habit when the mind, like an unguarded flame, bows and bends and seems about to blow from its holding.  I haven’t felt so young for years! Thought Peter, escaping from being precisely what he was, and feeling like a child who runs out of doors, and sees, as he runs, his old nurse waving at the window.”
--

“The compensation of growing old, Peter Walsh thought, coming out of Regeant Park , and holding his hat in his hand, was simply this; that the passions remain as strong as ever, but one has gained – at last! – the power which adds the supreme flavour to existence – the power of taking hold of experience, of turning it round, slowly in the light.
Life itself, every moment of it, every drop of it, here, this instant, now, in the sun, in Regent’s Park, was enough.  Too much, indeed.  A whole lifetime was too short to bring out, now that one had acquired the power, the full flavour; to extract every ounce of pleasure, every shade of meaning; which both were so much more solid than they used to be.” 88
--

“…to know her, or anyone, one must seek out the people who completed them; even the places.  Odd affinities she had with people she had never spoken to, some woman in the street, some man behind a counter – even trees, or barns.” 169

Sunday, August 05, 2012

Review: Ben-Hur by Lew Wallace

I didn`t read the abridged version, obviously
It’s very interesting reading books while you’re traveling, as they seem to take on a new life depending on where you are that coincides with your head space at the time.  I remember being in Venezia (Venice, Italy) and being completely absorbed with Orson Scott Card’s “Ender’s Game”.  In Edinburgh, I found myself frequently wanting to get home early (despite falling in love with the city), so I could finish Ben-Hur.  Interestingly enough, I missed a few sights in Edinburgh due to books.  I was walking to the Royal Botanical Gardens (a long trek from the city), and I found a really interesting book store with Dickens’ first editions and an eccentric Scot who talked to me until his store closed down.  I missed two other bookstores on the street because of all my chatting, and the Botanical Gardens as well.  But, as Steinbeck states “You don’t take a trip, a trip takes you,” and I believe my conversation with this bookseller was more important to my overall knowledge of books, book selling, UK bookstore distinctions from North America, Edinburgh city planning, and a multitude of random topics. 

That was a slight digression.  Now on to Ben-Hur, written by Lew Wallace.
I originally bought Ben-Hur due to the great movie with, if memory serves, Charlton Heston, which won best picture in 1980 if I recall correctly.  The parts I remember the most as a youth were those of the chariot scenes in the Roman Coliseum – and I guess I thought this was going to be a book about the gladiators.  I couldn’t have been more wrong.  This book is all about the life and meaning of Jesus and the struggle between the Romans and the Jews. 

Ben-Hur is a descendant from a prominent Jewish family who is incorrectly accused of attempted murder on the Roman emperor Gratus.  Gratus puts Ben-Hur into a life of slavery as a rower of military ships and his family is removed from their home, which is seized by the Romans.  Ben-Hur eventually becomes free and plots a course of revenge and a quest to find his mother and sister.
As Ben-Hur searches for his family, he also searches for a life meaning.  He eventually comes to the conclusion that his purpose is to help the King of the Jews in his endeavors, both physically and financially (since, by this time he is a wealthy man).  His initial belief is that Jesus has come to overthrow Rome and become King, and only later does he learn that Jesus of Nazareth has come to save the souls of men and show them life through his resurrection.

In addition, Ben-Hur has found what he believes to be love with the daughter of a wise Egyptian Sheik.  Her physical beauty knows no bounds and she has a sharp tongue and an independent and saucy personality.   He also has an attraction to a sweet, simpler Jewish woman named Esther.  I can relate to Ben-Hur’s struggle between the women and his desires for finding a mate.  There is some great writing about love.  One of my particular favourites is the determination of a moral of an ancient Egyptian tale.  The Egyptian states that the only cure for love is another love, while Hur exclaims that the only cure for love is death.  I’ve been thinking a lot about this and it’s hard to pick answer if forced to. 
For those worried that this book will be too religious, I’m going to attempt to quell your concerns.  I found the back story of Jesus, which I have heard a million times before, was finally brought to life for me.  The impact of Herod was also present, and it was very enjoyable to get a feeling like you were brought back in time (whether of fiction or non-fiction, I will not debate).  I really felt transported and that my knowledge of the time period, if not strengthened, was enhanced by what I read.  The characters were all very three dimensional to me and I felt interested in all of them.  Ben-Hur himself was presented with faults, but I was surprised that only a few of his weaknesses came back to haunt him.  I felt that his quest for revenge and vengeance instead of Christ’s teaching of love for all mankind, should have made itself known to him if not spelled his doom.  Neither outcome occurred.  However, his lackadaisical nature is protecting his past (ie: his loose tongue), did constantly create difficulties for him and Wallace makes this very evident slightly before the end of the work.

I didn’t find myself wanting to write down very many quotes, but a lot of the dialogue was very engaging.  Wallace does have a tendency to talk to the reader, something that I don’t generally like.  It was distracting at points, as he explicitly states in the novel why he has outlined a scene prior to – for the benefit of the reader.  This should be implicit instead of stated directly, and it made me feel as if I was being talked down to a bit. The story also seemed to lack fluidity when the backdrop and history of scenes were drawn out in too great a detail, but this was an infrequent occurrence throughout the work. 
Overall the book was an enjoyable read with concepts and historical context that I believe will take with me on my travels through this life.

“A man drowning may be saved; not so a man in love.” 413

Review: Paradise by Dante Alighieri

This is not really a review, but I haven’t said anything about Paradiso yet and I feel that without at least a quick post, Dante would not be sufficiently covered off.  I have been traveling for a month in Europe, so Dante has not really been at the forefront of my mind.  However, train time can be a forced productive time!
The beauty of Inferno was twofold – the imagery and the multitude of historic and cultural references.  The beauty of Purgatorio was in the struggle and the redemption of Dante himself, coupled with some great imagery.  In my opinion, Paradiso had very little that made the first two books so enjoyable.  The imagery was not as piercing and the stages of Paradiso do not stand out in my mind only a month after reading it.
I read a new Penguin edition and I believe the translator’s given and surname began with a K (Klein, perhaps?).  This edition as not illustrated as planned, as I had packed all of my books into storage by this time.  I found the best translator to be Ciardi and the best illustrator to be Dore.  Ciardi seemed more fluid then the other two translations I read, and it was a good mix between being modern and accurate.  Dryden’s translation was much stiffer and the recent penguin translation seemed to be oversimplified.  Dante illustrations seemed to add so much depth to the work that I felt a void when they were not there.  Even renowned artistic great, Blake, was not able to capture the essence of Dante (in my opinion)… making the Dore illustrations seem more profound in comparison.

Paradiso is frequently the Dante that most people do not read – and it’s my opinion that if you HAVE to miss one, this is the one to miss.  However, I have heard from others that this is their favourite work, but since no one in my book club was able to get through all three in the month, I was the only one who could offer an opinion on it.  I would suggest reading it for completeness and trying to read it with a Ciardi/Dore combination to get the most out of the text.