Showing posts with label The Mill on the Floss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Mill on the Floss. Show all posts

Monday, January 31, 2011

Movie Review: The Mill on the Floss

From L to R, Lucy, Maggie Tulliver, Tom Tulliver
Oh Tulliver family, how conflicted your lives are.  It hasn't been that long since I read "The Mill on the Floss" so many of the details were fresh in my mind.  When I rented the 'movie', I didn't realize that it was a BBC mini-series created prior to the year of my birth.  That said, they don't make them how they used to.  Slow movies that are true to the book are often not best sellers, especially in North America, so it was nice to see.  There were some errors that existed, but things need to be simplified to not draw the movie any longer than it's 212 minute duration.

Book: "The Mill on the Floss" by George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans)
Movie: "The Mill on the Floss" BBC
Book Publication Date: 1860
Movie Production Date: 1978
Read: July 2010
Watched: January 2011
Stars: 3.5

The characters were cast very appropriately.  The best acting came from Mr. Tulliver himself, who I found I felt the same way for him in the book as I did in the movie.  I loved him for his compassion and felt sorry for him with his inability to forgive.

Maggie Tulliver was cast twice - in the child years and then the adult years.  Same goes for Tom.  What was interesting though, is that Phillip Wakem remained the same actor throughout.  I guess humpbacks don't age or we're supposed to believe he's older due to some substantial mutton chops.  Dunno.

The movie was made like a soap opera in parts, which I laughed at for some time until I settled in and then didn't mind as much.  If you're a soap opera fan, you'll know what I mean.  I don't know what cinematography technique they use... I can only describe it as a matte finish on the film and a feeling that you're on the stage.

Maggie's aunts were as annoying as pictured in my head, with the men being just as accommodating of their intolerable wives.  Mrs. Tulliver was a good dichotomy of annoying/naive and sweet... showing some growth at the end.

The one thing that may have been a discrepancy, but I can't really recall what happened in the book.   Before the flood, Phillip Wakem came over and apologized to Maggie.  I don't know if this happened.  It wraps things up a little better, but I don't remember if the novel has this event.  Since the rest of the mini-series was pretty bang on, I assume this was the case and distrust my memory.

Has anyone else seen this movie/mini-series?  What did you think of it compared to the book?

Friday, July 16, 2010

The Mill on the Floss | George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans)

Let me preface by saying that this is the first time I have read anything by George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans). This is another work which set in the UK, written by a female author, and published in the Victorian era of the mid-19th century (1860). Based on that description, you could associate the work with a number of her peers... the Bronte sisters or Jane Austen. Looking back, the closest work I could relate it to would be “Jane Eyre”, which in my mind, is a compliment.


The story is about two siblings, Maggie and Tom Tulliver who grow up in the town of St. Ogg in the 1820-1830’s. It chronicles their lives from the ages of 8 and 10 respectively to adulthood. The novel centres on a few key themes: redemption, love and the “Divided Self.”

The main crisis in the Tulliver family details with the stubbornness of Mr. Tulliver, Maggie’s father. He is a proud man and his pride gets the better of him. When he gets into a legal battle with Mr. Wakem, he ends up losing all that he owns include his beloved Mill on the river Floss. Despite Mr. Wakem trying to make amends by employing Tulliver on the Mill (which he purchased from the bank), Tulliver never forgives Wakem and gets Tom to promise to eventually ruin Wakem [he swears it in the family Bible]. Tom spends his days working and his nights going to school (to be a bookkeeper) so he can earn enough money to pay off his father’s debts. He eventually makes some smart business decisions and “redeems” the family name. He has a falling out with Maggie, though, over her love for Mr. Wakem’s son Phillip. Tom feels as if all the hard work he is doing clearing the family name is being tarnished by Maggie’s actions.

While Tom is steadfast and unwavering on his one and only goal of clearing the family name, Maggie is continually struggling with her divided inner self. Her love for Phillip has been forbidden by Tom, and she continually fights with what she feels is doing the right thing (not seeing him) or ‘caving’ into her emotions. When she falls in love with her Cousin Lucy’s fiancĂ© Stephen, she now risks upsetting her only friends, Lucy and Phillip. Stephen feels the same way for Maggie, but Maggie will not allow her emotions to get the better of her and she struggles with her feelings. Life is hard for Maggie, but in the end she is brought to some peace with Tom, and ultimately, herself.

Maggie’s constant need for love and affection from Tom and others around her is her Achilles’ heel. She lives life for others and is conflicted when she can’t live up to everyone’s unrealistic expectations of her. If she didn’t care so much about what others thought and felt, she could be happy. In the end she would have married Stephen, moved away and lived a nice life together away from St. Ogg. But Maggie feels so strongly with her own emotions, she wishes to cause no emotional harm to others. In the end, she harms both worse by trying too hard not to.

The novel had great characters including some of Maggie’s aunts and uncles who were among the most deplorable human beings you could have imagined. Evans was able to paint all these characters with both strengths and faults, which really gave you the impression that they were real people and not ideals. This was in contrast to some other Victorian novels (ex: “Pride and Prejudice”), which made this work all the more special.

The prose had some great moments, but instead of being scattered throughout the work, they were often article interjections which occurred quite frequently at the end of the chapters. If Evans would have interspersed these moments throughout the novel, I think it would have made the work much stronger.

This novel may mirror the struggles of the author, Mary Ann Evans, who had an affair with a married man. You get the feeling that only direct experience with struggle would lead a writer to portray that struggle with such a bleeding heart. The emotional turmoil in this novel was well described, the characters were honest and the story was enthralling. If I had any criticism other than the one point in the preceding paragraph, it would be the ending. While it tied up the loose ends, it really didn’t feel right... and I kept waiting for a Wakem ruin that was never to be.