Showing posts with label War and Peace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War and Peace. Show all posts

Saturday, July 02, 2011

Review: War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy

Reviewing War and Peace is a daunting task I have put off for many months now.  I figured it would be smarter to let the book's wisdom digest, though like anything we read, with time it begins to fade.  There is no way to encapsulate this work at the best of times, but I will do my best here to tell you what I thought about the novel.
Many feel like 'War and Peace' is going to be a daunting task.  It's length is the number one worry, and I would say the second is that the book is in Russian, and many are afraid of being caught up with the character naming conventions.  I think the third factor that inhibits people from reading W&P is that they don't know much about the history of the War of 1812 and feel that they won't understand the plot.  Let me dissect some of these worries.

The length of the book is deceiving.  There is no question that it is long and requires some mental toughness and time to work your way through it.  However, with the exception of the second epilogue at the end, it doesn't feel long.  In fact, when I was finished with the work I felt like I had lost a part of my family - the book was over and there was no more.  I wanted it to be LONGER, so I could continue to follow the characters and learn more about Tolstoy's thoughts.  In today's world, it's hard to be able to focus on one book for so long without life getting in the way.  Mine definitely did, but I still found I could get back into the book if I put it down for a month and in a way, it was refreshing because I was able to reset my emotions and fall in love with the story again and again.  It took me maybe four months or so of reading at a moderate speed.  Someone told me that if you read a chapter a day you would finish in a year - the chapters are short though, and I would anticipate that you couldn't read so little of the work if you tried because it becomes encapsulating.

The names in Russian literature can sometimes become a struggle.  Some have three names, many are named the same given name, after their fathers.  I found this more difficult in other Russian works, and definitely more difficult in 'One Hundred Years of Solitude'.  In W&P, the main characters were so well discussed that after a few chapters you had no problem telling them apart.  Their mental descriptions were such that it was impossible to not make this distinction easily.  I think this is important to note, because sometimes the characters in novels are not 'full' characters and it becomes hard to differentiate them - this was definitely not the case here.  There were numerous smaller characters that made appearances, but this didn't distract from the overall book and the ones that were important were very easily to discern as well.  Some editions are more true to Russian names (Andrei) and some are anglicized (Andrew), so you can really choose what you prefer.  I had two copies of the book, so I was able to choose the one that suited my own personal style.

I read a little bit about the War of 1812 prior to reading W&P, but it really wasn't needed.  Tolstoy didn't get as detailed as you would have thought in regards to the numerous amounts of concessions and defeats and various countries participation in the war (in some cases fighting on both sides at different points in history).  He touches on specific battles, but tells you everything you need to know about them in a non-detailed way.  Due to the sheer length of the work, you wouldn't necessarily expect this but it was the truth.  The main battles discussed, that I can remember were 'The Battle of Austerlitz' (1805) and 'The Battle of Borodino' (1812), and of course the eventual occupation of Moscow.  You don't really need to do any external research, but as you continue to read W&P you will probably find that you want to do some side research because it's just so interesting.

So what was War and Peace about?  The simple answer... life (in Russian leading up to and following the War of 1812). 

The book is so complex that it's difficult to summarize.  The book is split into various sections detailing what Russian was like for aristocrats in times of Peace, followed by life for the aristocrats and the peasantry in times of War.  Many in my bookclub enjoyed the tales of Peace the most, but I found both equally fascinating... and truth be told, I may have enjoyed the war time more.

The book touches on many important subjects, such as personal and spiritual development of the individual, love, the concept on how histories are written, war as a living entity, free will versus determinism, the aristocracy, peasantry, religion, life, death, etc.
*SOME SPOILERS FROM THIS POINT - but not in tremendous detail*



Tolstoy talks much about the flawed ways that histories are written.  He discusses the overemphasis on generals and their effect on the war, including letters sent in battles detailing strategy that is already outdated by the time it makes it to the people actually fighting the wars.  He talks about writers and historians coming up with a theory and working backwards to fit each circumstance to that theory to serve their own purposes.  One of the main dislikes of most of the people in the bookclub was that the second epilogue discussed these points in more detail, which could be considered by some as overkill, as we already knew Tolstoy's opinions on the matter from his interjections throughout the book.  These interjections were fascinating and gave better context to the overall work. 

One of the most interesting parts of the book dealt with how wars became their own entities; a force that could not be controlled.  Tolstoy's view on this was very spiritual and largely against the theory of free will. 

Religion was interspersed throughout the novel, but more in a spiritual way instead by way of religious propaganda. By this, I mean that we were not hit over the head with particular religious beliefs, which some English books around the time period were apt to do with Christianity.  Tolstoy was very spiritual, but he didn't push anything on to you; he simply allows you to think and feel how you wish.

Tolstoy obviously loved the peasantry over the aristocracy, and this was very present in the work.  We mainly see the lives of the aristocracy throughout the book, and especially at the beginning.  As we get more into the war, we get glimpses of the lives of the peasants but nothing in tremendous detail.  We experience more through the eyes of the aristocracy, and I believe he paints a very balanced view.

For those of you who enjoy good love stories with intrigue, passion and heartache - you will find what you are looking for in W&P. Everyone seemed to fall in love with Natasha, who was a free spirit until later on in the novels and was full of life. Sofia seemed to get a hard rap, as her love was more enduring and less fickle, but due to caste reasons she never seemed to get the love she deserved. Mary ended up with her beau, but she went through many struggles with men, including her father, who treated her very poorly.

*END OF SPOILERS*

Tolstoy treats life and death both very seriously, and one cannot help but think about his/her own life in the grand scheme of things.  Have we lived?  Do we understand the world in which we live and are we at peace with it?  Are we afraid of death or are we afraid of life?  All these questions are brought to the forefront of the readers mind.

The prose of this work was beautiful - particularly around the self reflection and growth of others.  The metaphors were strong, and it was evident to me that Tolstoy knew much about various subjects in life (such as the lives of bees, as one example), which we learned about as the story drew on.  I wrote down many quotations, and hopefully I will make it back to them all one day because that in itself would be rewarding.  The style, in general, had a beautiful flow to it and was not as thick as you would believe.  The book was very easy to read, and at the same time very deep and rewarding.

I know I have not done this book justice with this review; I believe the task is a very daunting one.  But I hope that I implore you all to read War and Peace if you have not yet already.  More than half of our book club found this book to be in their top five of books they had ever read, with quite a few naming it the BEST book they had ever read.  Sometimes we must throw our caution into the wind, in order to grow.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Book Beginnings | War and Peace

So this is a little bit of 'cart before the horse', since usually I post the beginning line of the book before I begin to read it, let alone post a review of the first book (of four).  But since I have been enthralled with this work, I neglected to post the opening line.

"Well, Prince, so Genoa and Lucca are now just family estates of the Buonapartes. But I warn you, if you don't tell me that this means war, if you still try to defend the infamies and horrors perpetrated by that Antichrist—I really believe he is Antichrist—I will have nothing more to do with you and you are no longer my friend, no longer my 'faithful slave,' as you call yourself! But how do you do? I see I have frightened you—sit down and tell me all the news."

I laughed when I re-read this, because it's evident to me that this opening line would scare the crap out of people and may make some readers stop in their tracks.  That said, I really enjoy this opening line looking back.  It would be better if you had a preliminary understanding of the Napoleonic Wars before you read this, but rest assured that the rest of the book doesn't need more than a cursory history lesson which you can get in 15 minutes on wikipedia.



I really enjoy the use of dialogue in setting the scene, which I believe was a rarer device for an opening line during the time period, which typically focused on a long-run on detailed description of the setting [see Henry James' opening line next week].  I also like the ferocity of emotion and sets the reader up for a customary diplomatist reception.

Thoughts?

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

War & Peace | Book 1 Review

My version of War & Peace is divided into four books, and I have completed the first book in a little less than a month.  Not bad, as my assumption was that it would take me the entire year to finish this approx 1475 page behemoth.  I'm nearly 400 pages through, now and I am enjoying every second of it.

The book contains war details and what is happening on the home front including diplomatic elements, duels and practical jokes.  Someone once told me there were two types of writing - one that tells an element or a few elements of a story or topic and one which tries to explain everything over a time period.  Tolstoy has been renowned for the latter, and I must admit to being completely scared about this type of writing before starting the novel.  Now, I am completely absorbed and all I want to do is take a month off of work and read it non-stop.

I have had to do a little bit of external research on the Napoleonic Wars, and I must say that I am FASCINATED by the history.  My general impression of Napoleon was always of a little man with a lot to prove due to his stature, that won a few battles for France.  I had no idea the magnitude, and I'm really starting to appreciate his military mind.

In historical terms, book 1 deals with 1805, which is essentially the War of the Third Coalition with France on the one side, and Russia/Austria on the other.  The General at the time on the Russian side was Mikhail Kutusov (Emperor = Alexander I), which I have somehow developed an attachment to as I read.  The General became a scapegoat for a lot of the Russian losses in the battle of Austerlitz despite some of the incompetence of other Russian leaders (according to the book) in developing a game plan for the battle.  And of course, most of the Russians blamed Austria as well... and it's quite possible that the reverse is also true.

Anyway, I just loved reading about the battles in 1805 and I am incredibly impressed with Tolstoy.  I am seriously considering reading some other epic works after War & Peace, because at least in this case, the length (keep in mind I'm only 400 pages in) seems to be completely justified.  I have been reading other works in between, and I find this takes me away a little from the story.  I believe if you're going to read works concurrently, make sure you don't leave War & Peace for any extended period of time and then try to pick it back up.  Just my advice for some of the rest of you who are currently completing War & Peace challenges.

The names are a little distracting, but I have an edition that I believe simplifies this somehow without changing the text.  I'll post the translator eventually, but the book was published by 'The Folio Society', a publisher I have 99% confidence in (how can you really have 100% confidence in any publisher? :)  The main characters are often referred to (I guess this is the definition of a main character), but I still find myself forgetting whom did which during what time.  Tolstoy refers back though, and I find this helps me out a lot.

For those in my book club and in the general blogging world, WITHOUT SPOILERS, please let me know what you're thinking of the work so far.

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

War & Peace Challenge

There are a few read-a-longs of 'War & Peace' occuring in the book blogging community in 2011.  It turns out that it's a perfect one year challenge:  If you read one chapter a day, apparently, you will be done at the end of the year.  So I thought that during these challenges that I read so much about, why not begin a similar challenge with my non-virtual world book club (jokingly referred to as 'book club in real life')?

I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to keep up with this, and I definitely won't be starting until the end of the month because I have two books on the go in addition to two magazines (TIME, National Geographic) which I'd like to finish.  Work will probably be really busy this month as well, so we'll see when I can get around to it.  Anyways, there will probably be prizes which I think will make it fun.  I'm toying with an idea where everyone brings in a 're-gifted book' and winners get to choose from a pile of books in some sort of order.  I've been thinking of creating some interesting awards like:

"Fastest Procratinator" [for those that leave most of the reading until the last month] or
"Skimmer Extroardinare" [someone who doesn't really 'READ' the book, but just skims through it]

...or whatever.  Would love to hear some suggestions on awards and please leave a comment if you're also planning on reading 'War & Peace' this year, whether part of a challenge or otherwise.